- MGMT Playbook
- Posts
- The Hidden Tax on Your Business
The Hidden Tax on Your Business
What's the cost of bad management? We calculate just how much profit one bad manager can wipe out from a company.
Read Time: 2 minutes.
Quick ask: Even if this newsletter doesn’t hit for you, please answer our 5-second question about your preferred LLM in the poll at the bottom.
The Question No One Asks
You track revenue per employee. Cost per acquisition. Gross margin.
But do you know what one bad manager costs your business?
Most leaders don't.
They see underperformance as a "people problem" or a "culture issue."
But bad management is killing your bottom-line.
And the numbers are brutal.
The Manager Performance Gap
I didn’t want this to be a hand-wavy exercise. So I started with studies from credible sources and eliminated dozens that could have been added to these three.
Gallup
Harvard Business Review
Human Resources Society (SHRM)
Here's what happens when you compare bottom-quartile managers to top-quartile managers across three key drivers:
Driver | Bottom 25% | Middle 50% | Top 25% | The Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual Turnover Rate | 30% | 15% | 8% | 22 percentage points |
Team Productivity | 82% of potential | 95% of potential | 110% of potential | 28 percentage points |
Profitability Impact | Baseline | +24% | +48% | 48 percentage points |
Sources: Gallup State of the American Manager (27M+ employees), SHRM, Harvard Business Review
What This Means in Real Money
Percentages are hard to attach to. They don’t make the pain of this difference real enough. So, let's make this concrete with the numbers of a typical SMB:
$5M revenue company generating $1M in EBITDA.
And let’s take two managers—Manager A (Bottom 25%) and Manager B (Top 25%)—and give each one a 10-person team with $700K in annual team payroll.
Same title.
Same budget.
Same team size.
Here's what the performance gap costs:
Driver 1: Turnover
Manager A: 30% turnover = 3 people leave annually
Manager B: 8% turnover = less than 1 person leaves annually
Replacement cost: $70K average salary × 100% replacement cost = $70K per departure
The gap: 2.2 extra departures × $70K = $154K annual cost
Driver 2: Productivity
Manager A: Team operates at 82% of potential
Manager B: Team operates at 110% of potential
Team payroll: $700K
The gap: 28 percentage points × $700K = $196K in lost output
Driver 3: Profitability
Manager A: Baseline profitability on their portion of revenue
Manager B: 48% higher profitability
Revenue responsibility: Each manager influences ~$500K in revenue (10% of company)
Company EBITDA margin: 20% ($1M profit on $5M revenue)
Baseline profit from their area: $500K × 20% = $100K
The gap: 48% higher profitability = $48K additional profit
The Total Annual Impact
Cost Category | Annual Difference |
|---|---|
Excess turnover | $154K |
Lost productivity | $196K |
Profitability gap | $48K |
TOTAL ANNUAL COST | $398K |
Manager A costs the company $398K more annually than Manager B.
For a company with $1M in EBITDA, one bad manager is destroying 40% of your profit.
And this is conservative. We’re not even considering:
Engagement costs
Customer satisfaction
Innovation losses
Friction they impose on other teams
The 40% Rule of Thumb
Want to estimate what your worst manager is costing your company?
Here are two simple ways:
If You Know The Revenue/Profit They Produce
Take the number being produced by your worst manager’s team, and multiple it by 1.4.
That difference is the money you’re leaving on the table.
If The Team’s Direct Contribution is Fuzzy
Add up the total compensation for the whole team and multiply that by 1.4.
The difference is again the value you’re missing out on.
Why does this work?
Because if you have a team isn’t at least paying for themselves (i.e. at least delivering enough value to cover their own costs) you won’t be in business for long.
Again, I’m being conversative. This is likely understating just how much money you’re losing from not addressing this issue.
Here’s one more to drive it home:
Divide that number by 200 (those are work days in a year) and write it on a post-it.
That way you can be reminded about how much money you’re lighting on fire every day you tolerate a bad manager.
Why This Matters
Most organizations treat management development as an HR checkbox.
"Promote our best people. Hope they figure it out."
But the ROI on management development is 10:1 or greater.
The math:
Invest $10K-$20K developing a manager
Prevent $200K-$400K in losses
Unlock additional value through higher performance
There may be no higher-ROI investment in your business.
Your Next Move
This week, answer three questions:
Who are your bottom-quartile managers? (You know who they are)
What value should their team create? (Estimate the gap at 40%)
What's your plan? (Develop them, move them, or exit them)
Because bad managers aren't just underperformers.
They cost you real money.
And every day you wait costs you more than you think.
Lead on,
Dave
PS - We need your input. We’re building something new to help more people become AI-Accelerated Leaders. But we can only build it on LLM.
Which should we choose?
Which LLM do you rely on most for work? |
Ways To Work With Us
MGMT Accelerator: A live cohort-based leadership development program.
MGMT Fundamentals: A two-week training program for new managers.
Custom Programs: Workshops built and delivered for your company.
1:1 Executive Coaching: C-suite leaders looking to scale.
Keynote speaking: Leadership lessons for your event or offsite.\
Learn about them all at: davekline.com